The best one year is mediocre the next. The worst school improves after an intervention. Both
look like causes and neither is: any score is skill plus luck, and luck does not
repeat. Wherever you selected on an extreme, the next measurement drifts back on its own.
This year against next year
What the top ten per cent did next
everyonethe top ten per centno change line
The same statement, with the numbers in it
ρ is the share of the spread that is real. At ρ = 1 nothing
regresses — the score is all skill. At ρ = 0 the first score tells you nothing and
the second lands on the average, every time.